February 11, 2006

Myers-Brigg Personality Test

I recently was humiliated to find that everybody knows their letters (ISTJ, ENFJ, ect) and so I decided to go online and take a (most likely non scientific) test that would tell me what my letters were so I could be cool too. I've probably taken one of these in some psych class once, or at least you would think I would have since I was one class away from a psych minor.

I came out as an INTJ, also known as a 'mastermind' (which, lets face it, is hilarious). However, I thought that you, my friends, would probably be the best people in the world to say this matches me... or not. So check it out and be careful not to insult me, because I could 'mastermind' an unfortunate event!! Ok, not really, well I could really, but I wouldn't.

These articles are located are located in full here for Article 1 and here for Article 2, but they are mostly intact here.

Article 1:

Of the four aspects of strategic analysis and definition, it is the contingency planning or entailment organizing role that reaches the highest development in Masterminds. Entailing or contingency planning is not an informative activity, rather it is a directive one in which the planner tells others what to do and in what order to do it. As the organizing capabilities the Masterminds increase so does their inclination to take charge of whatever is going on.

It is in their abilities that Masterminds differ from the other Rationals, while in most of their attitudes they are just like the others. However there is one attitude that sets them apart from other Rationals: they tend to be much more self-confident than the rest, having, for obscure reasons, developed a very strong will. They are rather rare, comprising no more than, say, one percent of the population. Being very judicious, decisions come naturally to them; indeed, they can hardly rest until they have things settled, decided, and set. They are the people who are able to formulate coherent and comprehensive contingency plans, hence contingency organizers or "entailers."

Masterminds will adopt ideas only if they are useful, which is to say if they work efficiently toward accomplishing the Mastermind's well-defined goals. Natural leaders, Masterminds are not at all eager to take command of projects or groups, preferring to stay in the background until others demonstrate their inability to lead. Once in charge, however, Masterminds are the supreme pragmatists, seeing reality as a crucible for refining their strategies for goal-directed action. In a sense, Masterminds approach reality as they would a giant chess board, always seeking strategies that have a high payoff, and always devising contingency plans in case of error or adversity. To the Mastermind, organizational structure and operational procedures are never arbitrary, never set in concrete, but are quite malleable and can be changed, improved, streamlined. In their drive for efficient action, Masterminds are the most open-minded of all the types. No idea is too far-fetched to be entertained-if it is useful. Masterminds are natural brainstormers, always open to new concepts and, in fact, aggressively seeking them. They are also alert to the consequences of applying new ideas or positions. Theories which cannot be made to work are quickly discarded by the Masterminds. On the other hand, Masterminds can be quite ruthless in implementing effective ideas, seldom counting personal cost in terms of time and energy.

Article 2:

To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know.

INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.

INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.

INTJ's tremendous value and need for systems and organization, combined with their natural insightfulness, makes them excellent scientists. INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.

It is not easy for the INTJ to express their internal images, insights, and abstractions. The internal form of the INTJ's thoughts and concepts is highly individualized, and is not readily translatable into a form that others will understand. However, the INTJ is driven to translate their ideas into a plan or system that is usually readily explainable, rather than to do a direct translation of their thoughts. They usually don't see the value of a direct transaction, and will also have difficulty expressing their ideas, which are non-linear. However, their extreme respect of knowledge and intelligence will motivate them to explain themselves to another person who they feel is deserving of the effort.

Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.

This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.

Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications.


Posted by 10lees at February 11, 2006 06:30 PM
Comments

Knowing you mainly through working with you, I'd say it fits. Especially the stuff about dealing with certain types of authority...

Posted by: Jeremy at February 11, 2006 07:46 PM

Hmmm. It seems to fit you. Maybe it's the power of suggestion, but then maybes it's a sort of "yeah, I could see that." Comparing your letters with my own, I think the F/T and P/J differences make sense--at least in my mind.

Regarding the perfectionist part....you need an "f" in your second link so that it's "a href" rather than "a hre" :-)

Posted by: INFP at February 11, 2006 11:00 PM

I'm an ISTJ - they say I'm very marketable. Ah well - the rest of my life will be managing a duplex. Great use of my talents don't chu know???!!!

The tenents don't like my straightforwardness though.
Love,
m

Posted by: Bevy at February 12, 2006 12:06 PM

ENFP here. It fits me pretty well. You share the same letters as Gossett though.

Posted by: jeff at February 13, 2006 06:20 AM

10, i think INTJ + ENFJ = the amazing lack of sleep and amounts of fun we had in college... ;o)

Posted by: dr gonzo at February 13, 2006 08:17 AM

College was very very fun!! Ah, the lack of sleep, I am surprised I could function back then - sadly I could not do it now. Of course I am 26 (aaaahh!) Just kidding, 26 is fun so far.

Jeff, I read yours and I think it fits you. You are one wild and crazy guy!

Posted by: 10lees at February 15, 2006 12:28 PM

I am definitely an INFJ. Read all about me if you dare. The real reason no one can understand me is that so few people are like me. Yeah. I like that excuse. :) The basic bottom line is that I do everything because I "feel" a certain way about it.

I'm glad we're parallel personalities, 10. :)

Posted by: Lo at February 15, 2006 05:25 PM

I am also an INTJ. Though I have also scored as an INTP. It depends on my mood when I take the test. :)

Posted by: babada at February 16, 2006 11:17 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?